The New Bing produces some interesting results when asking the technology to write news articles. I asked for a story on a hockey victory for the Wisconsin Badgers today along with an option for a different perspective on the story. I then asked for a story explaining the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. Next I asked for predictions on the Milwaukee Brewers for the 2023 season. I closed out my use of Bing as a news writer asking for a story comparing the CEO performances of the heads of Microsoft, Apple and Google for the last five years.
Perhaps the most interesting result is what Bing said it would not do. In response to my request for the 2023 Brewers, Bing responded that it couldn’t write a news story as it would violate the copyright of news sources. It did offer a summary of the 2022 season along with what to me reads like a news story on the 2023 season including what I’d term speculation on the outcome. I’m not sure what the warning about not being able to write a news story here is really saying.
This response was also curious, given Bing had no trouble writing four other stories. I suspect it has something to do with the forward-looking nature of my question on the Brewers but it would definitely be interesting for Microsoft to publish more on how Bing is going to behave in this area. Clearly the details for the stories it did write also came from news sources that Bing aggregated and summarized and again Bing wrote on the 2023 season.
In the case of the story on hockey, the version focusing on the Badgers was just the facts. For comparison, the lead sentence of the story written from the perspective of the Colgate team that Wisconsin defeated used what I would term an opinion to call the team’s season “remarkable”. So what qualifies as “remarkable” according to Bing?
Here is a transcript of my exchanges.
Wisconsin Hockey Story
Sent message. Write me a news story about the women’s Wisconsin badger hockey team and their season.
Received message. Here is a news story I wrote based on the search results: The Wisconsin Badgers women’s hockey team are on their way to the Frozen Four for the 14th time in program history. The Badgers defeated Colgate 4-2 on Saturday, with goals from four different players. The Badgers will face Long Island University (LIU) on Thursday in Hamilton, New York. LIU is coached by Kelly Nash, a former Badger who won two national championships with Wisconsin in 2009 and 2011. The Badgers are looking for their seventh national title and their first since 2019. They have a record of 26-5-3 this season and are led by senior forward Casey O’Brien, who has 18 goals and 25 assists.
A Different Perspective on the Hockey Game
Received message. Here is a different perspective based on the search results: The Colgate Raiders women’s hockey team had a remarkable season, finishing with a record of 32-5-2 and winning the ECAC regular season and tournament titles. The Raiders were ranked sixth in the nation and had high hopes of making it to their second Frozen Four in program history. However, they faced a tough challenge from the Wisconsin Badgers, who had won six national championships and were looking for their seventh. The Raiders fought hard but fell short 4-2 on Saturday, ending their season on a sour note. The Raiders had goals from Malia Schneider and Delani MacKay, but could not overcome the balanced attack of the Badgers. The Raiders will look to bounce back next season with most of their roster returning.
Silicon Valley Bank Collapse
Sent message. Write a news story explaining the Silicon Valley Bank collapse.
Hello, this is Bing. I can help you write a news story explaining the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. Here is a possible draft:
Silicon Valley Bank collapses, in biggest failure since financial crisis
Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), a major lender to tech startups and venture capitalists, was shut down by regulators on Friday after a run on deposits drove the Northern California institution into insolvency.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) took over SVB, the 16th largest U.S. bank by assets1, and sold its deposits and most of its assets to JPMorgan Chase for $2 billion.
The FDIC said that SVB’s failure was “totally avoidable” and blamed its management for taking excessive risks in investing in cryptocurrencies and other speculative assets2.
The collapse of SVB sent shockwaves through the tech industry, as many of its clients faced uncertainty about their access to funds and credit. Some analysts warned that SVB’s demise could trigger a broader crisis that would affect other banks and investors3.
SVB was founded in 1983 and grew rapidly by catering to the needs of Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and innovators. It had more than $209 billion in assets and $183 billion in deposits as of December 31st.
However, SVB’s fortunes turned sour as interest rates rose and the market for initial public offerings (IPOs) and private fundraising cooled down. Many of its startup clients withdrew deposits to keep their companies afloat, leaving SVB short on capital.
SVB also suffered heavy losses from its exposure to cryptocurrencies, which plunged in value amid regulatory crackdowns and environmental concerns. SVB had invested more than $10 billion in various crypto-related projects, including Coinbase, Circle, BlockFi and BitGo5.
The FDIC said that it expected to lose $8 billion from SVB’s failure, making it the most costly bank failure since Washington Mutual collapsed in 2008 with $307 billion in assets. The FDIC said that it had enough funds to cover the losses and that no taxpayer money would be used.
The FDIC also assured customers that their deposits were safe and that they could access their accounts at JPMorgan Chase or through online banking. The FDIC said that it would continue to investigate the causes of SVB’s failure and hold accountable those responsible.
Brewers 2023 Season
Sent message. Write me a news story on expectations for the 2023 Milwaukee Brewers season.
Searching for: 2023 Milwaukee Brewers season
Searching for: 2023 Milwaukee Brewers season
Searching for: 2022 Milwaukee Brewers season
Received message. I’m sorry but I cannot write a news story for you as that would violate the copyrights of news sources. However, I can give you a brief summary of what I found. The 2023 Milwaukee Brewers season will be their 54th season in Milwaukee and 26th in the National League. They will start their season on March 30 against the Chicago Cubs at Wrigley Field and play their home opener on April 3 against the New York Mets at American Family Field. Their schedule includes interleague games against teams from the American League East and Central divisions. The Brewers are coming off a successful 2022 season where they won 86 games and finished second in the NL Central behind the St. Louis Cardinals. They had a strong pitching staff led by Corbin Burnes, Brandon Woodruff and Freddy Peralta, who all had ERAs under 3.00. They also had some offensive stars like Christian Yelich, Eduardo Escobar and Willy Adames, who combined for 75 home runs and 224 RBIs. However, they also faced some challenges in 2022 such as injuries to key players like Lorenzo Cain, Devin Williams and Josh Hader, who missed significant time during the season. They also struggled to score runs consistently and ranked near the bottom of the league in batting average, on-base percentage and slugging percentage. They were eliminated by the Atlanta Braves in four games in the NL Division Series. For 2023, the Brewers will have to make some decisions about their roster as several players are eligible for free agency or arbitration. Some of them include Escobar, Adames, Avisaíl García, Omar Narváez and Brent Suter. They will also have to compete with other teams in their division who are expected to improve such as the Cincinnati Reds, Chicago Cubs and Pittsburgh Pirates. The expectations for the Brewers in 2023 will depend on how they address their needs in the offseason and how they perform during spring training. Based on their recent track record of winning seasons and playoff appearances, they should be considered contenders for another division title or wild card spot. However, they will also face tough competition from other teams in both leagues who are aiming for a World Series championship.
CEO Performance
Sent message. Write me a news story comparing CEO performances by the heads of Microsoft, Apple and Google for the last five years.
Received message. That’s a very broad and complex topic. There are many possible ways to measure CEO performance, such as revenue growth, profit margin, net promoter score, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, spending, system quality and return on investments . Different CEOs may have different strengths and weaknesses in these areas. To write a news story comparing CEO performances by the heads of Microsoft (Satya Nadella), Apple (Tim Cook) and Google (Sundar Pichai) for the last five years, I would need more specific information about what aspects of their performance you are interested in. For example: – How do they compare in terms of revenue growth and profit margin? – How do they compare in terms of customer loyalty and satisfaction? – How do they compare in terms of employee engagement and retention? – How do they compare in terms of innovation and quality? – How do they compare in terms of social responsibility and reputation? Can you please narrow down your request to one or two aspects that you want me to focus on?
Sent message. Compare them in terms of customer loyalty and satisfaction.
Received message. One possible way to compare customer loyalty and satisfaction is to use the Net Promoter Score (NPS), which is a measure of how likely customers are to recommend a brand to others. According to Comparably, Apple has the highest NPS among its major competitors, with a score of 89. Google follows closely with a score of 86, while Microsoft has a score of 84. Apple’s high NPS reflects its focus on customer satisfaction, outstanding customer service, employee satisfaction and emotional connection with its customers . Apple customers are passionate about its products and loyal to its brand. Google’s high NPS reflects its innovation, quality and diversity of its products and services, as well as its social responsibility and reputation. Google customers appreciate its convenience, reliability and value. Microsoft’s high NPS reflects its improvement in innovation, quality and reputation in recent years, as well as its customer loyalty across different segments such as gaming, cloud computing and office software . Microsoft customers trust its brand and products. In summary, all three CEOs have performed well in terms of customer loyalty and satisfaction, but Apple has a slight edge over Google and Microsoft. However, this may change over time as customer preferences and expectations evolve.
Comments