This is a textbook example of a complete lack of accountability from both Fidelity Investments and Elan Financial Services for a fundamental accessibility failure. On January 11, 2026, I reported a serious accessibility issue to both Fidelity and Elan around the website used for a Fidelity-branded credit card from Elan. Fidelity confirmed the issue via email to me on January 16, 2026. I’ve had no response from Elan. Two months later and there is no change. Why?
As I mentioned, Fidelity offers a credit card that comes from Elan but is branded as a Fidelity credit card. As you’d expect, there is a website where you can view transactions and more.
When reviewing transactions, an ARIA-Label on the table row with all the transaction details is used. This is an absolute disaster for accessibility. On top of this, just about all the table columns are filled with blank cells when read with a screen reader because ARIA-Hidden is used on the data in those cells.
It is bad enough that all the data, as a result of the ARIA-Label, is jammed into one long string. The fact that an actual table is still present but the columns are all blank with a screen reader, when you really need a properly structured table to review financial transactions effectively, just compounds the problem.
Ironically, maybe a month ago, the credit card was changed so that if you have multiple cardholders on the account, transactions show up under the name of each cardholder. This column is actually shown in the table when using a screen reader with data.
A Real Example
This is an example from my account just now for one of the ARIA-Labels. Note I changed the ending digits from my card here to 0000 and deleted some of the HTML for styling.
<tr aria-label=”Transaction details for POSTED Transaction Date: 2026-03-24, Transaction Description: Sheraton Hotel, User: KellyF… 0000, DEBIT Transaction Amount: 28.88″>
Can You Say Double Standard?
You can bet if the visual experience was broken in some equivalent way, such as all the table data jammed into a single cell, it wouldn’t take more than two months for something to be done. The sad thing is that this is just par for the course when it comes to accessibility. There is little to no accountability for accessibility basics when they are broken. Fine, mistakes happen. What you do or do not do about them speaks volumes. Leaving the user to deal with this kind of garbage, well, what’s that message? Using a screen reader should not mean you get an inferior experience.
One Comment